Central Connecticut
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
762  Elizabeth Eberhardt SR 21:17
1,171  Brittany Mendelson FR 21:44
1,499  Krisztina Dearborn SR 22:04
1,857  Shannon McBride SR 22:25
2,000  Ally Gates JR 22:34
2,718  Jazmin Booker JR 23:27
3,079  Victoria Cronin FR 24:06
3,200  Kathleen Wysocki FR 24:24
3,203  Taylor Lepage SR 24:24
3,262  Paxton McNierney SO 24:33
National Rank #203 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #26 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 3.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Elizabeth Eberhardt Brittany Mendelson Krisztina Dearborn Shannon McBride Ally Gates Jazmin Booker Victoria Cronin Kathleen Wysocki Taylor Lepage Paxton McNierney
CCSU Ted Owen Invitational 09/27 1271 21:10 21:51 22:15 22:47 24:01 23:49 25:10 23:31
NWICAAA Championship 10/11 1288 21:29 22:14 22:28 22:32 23:44 24:07 25:02
CCSU Mini Meet 10/24 1300 21:22 22:34 22:32 23:05 24:04 24:14 23:40
Northeast Conference Championship 11/01 1226 20:57 22:03 22:14 22:21 22:46 23:22 24:22 23:58 25:32 24:33
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 1225 21:20 21:25 21:54 22:25 22:18 23:17 24:31





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.3 750 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.7 2.9 4.0 6.9 12.6 17.9 24.7 16.6 6.9 2.4 1.0 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elizabeth Eberhardt 91.6 0.0
Brittany Mendelson 129.9
Krisztina Dearborn 154.3
Shannon McBride 182.0
Ally Gates 193.0
Jazmin Booker 241.5
Victoria Cronin 268.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.2% 0.2 17
18 0.5% 0.5 18
19 0.9% 0.9 19
20 1.7% 1.7 20
21 2.9% 2.9 21
22 4.0% 4.0 22
23 6.9% 6.9 23
24 12.6% 12.6 24
25 17.9% 17.9 25
26 24.7% 24.7 26
27 16.6% 16.6 27
28 6.9% 6.9 28
29 2.4% 2.4 29
30 1.0% 1.0 30
31 0.4% 0.4 31
32 0.2% 0.2 32
33 0.0% 0.0 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0